
The Cost of a Breach – Why Endpoint Security is Your First Line of Défense
🕓 August 15, 2025
If you’ve ever driven a high-performance sports car, you know the thrill of speed — but you also know the importance of safety measures. You wouldn’t dream of hitting the highway without a seatbelt, airbags, and a braking system designed for emergencies.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is like that sports car. It’s fast, powerful, and can take you places you’ve never imagined. But without proper controls — AI governance — it can swerve dangerously off course.
In 2025, AI isn’t just a buzzword. It’s powering fraud detection in banks, predictive maintenance in oil & gas, customer service in telecoms, and even national security in government agencies. But the same AI that boosts productivity can also introduce bias, security risks, and regulatory nightmares if not managed responsibly.
AI governance is the framework of rules, policies, and procedures that ensures AI systems are ethical, transparent, compliant, and secure. Think of it as the traffic laws for AI.
According to Gartner:
“AI Governance is the framework for ensuring AI systems are accountable, fair, transparent, and compliant with regulations.”
And it covers four main pillars:
The need for governance has skyrocketed because:
In regions like the UAE and Saudi Arabia, AI governance is not just a best practice — it’s becoming a business necessity. The UAE’s AI Strategy 2031 sets a clear path for responsible AI adoption and national AI ethics. Organizations in banking, telecom, and government must demonstrate AI transparency, bias mitigation, and security compliance to win contracts and maintain trust.
A Simple Analogy: AI Without Governance Is Like a Driverless Car Without a Map
Imagine you’re in a fully autonomous car. It can accelerate, turn, and stop on its own. But what if it doesn’t know the difference between a road and a sidewalk? Or if it prioritizes speed over safety?
That’s AI without governance — powerful but potentially dangerous.
Both cases could have been prevented with AI fairness testing tools like IBM’s AI Fairness 3601- Guide to AI Governance
Without governance, you risk:
With governance, you gain:
PointGuard AI automates AI governance by:
AI is now embedded across finance, healthcare, oil & gas, and public sector in the GCC and UAE—bringing both speed and new attack surfaces. This FAQ answers the most common questions we get from CISOs, risk owners, and AI program leads about AI risks, AI security in GCC, AI threats in UAE, prompt injection attacks, and AI risk management best practices—with practical steps you can apply today.
In 2025, the leading AI risks include deepfake fraud, prompt injection attacks, AI supply chain compromises, data poisoning, and model theft. These threats can cause financial losses, operational disruption, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties. For example, a European bank lost $25M due to a voice-cloned deepfake CEO scam, while an LNG plant in the Middle East suffered a $15M shutdown from a backdoored open-source AI model
AI attacks often exploit the unique behavior of models rather than just technical vulnerabilities. Techniques like prompt injection manipulate AI into revealing sensitive data without triggering conventional security alerts. Deepfakes are so realistic they can bypass human verification. Additionally, poisoned datasets can silently degrade AI accuracy over time without obvious red flags.
A prompt injection attack manipulates an AI system by embedding malicious instructions within seemingly normal input. For instance, an Asian bank’s chatbot was tricked into revealing account details because it “trusted” the attacker’s crafted queries. Defenses include pre-deployment red teaming, runtime monitoring, and output sanitization
AI supply chain attacks occur when attackers compromise third-party AI components, such as open-source models, before they are integrated into your system. Once inside, these malicious models can disable safety controls, exfiltrate data, or inject hidden backdoors. The risk is high in GCC industries like oil & gas and BFSI, where imported models are common
Data poisoning subtly corrupts training datasets, so AI systems learn incorrect patterns. For example, fraud detection AI can be trained to ignore fraudulent patterns, enabling criminals to bypass detection entirely. Mitigation involves secure data pipelines, provenance checks, and anomaly monitoring
Model theft (or extraction) allows attackers to replicate proprietary AI systems by repeatedly querying them. Stolen models can be resold, used to compete unfairly, or modified for malicious use—without the original developer’s investment in R&D. Preventive measures include query rate limiting, output watermarking, and secure hosting environments
Yes. GCC markets face amplified risks due to rapid AI adoption without mature governance structures, heavy reliance on cross-border AI vendors, and high dependency on open-source AI in critical sectors like energy, finance, and telecom. This combination increases exposure to supply chain compromises and compliance challenges
Industry reports reveal a troubling gap: 72% of security leaders list AI threats as a top IT risk, yet one-third of organizations still don’t perform regular AI security testing. Even when vulnerabilities are found, only 21% of serious AI issues are fixed, leaving a backlog of exploitable flaws
Key frameworks include:
Runtime AI defense continuously inspects live prompts and outputs for malicious patterns, such as jailbreak attempts, sensitive data leakage, or adversarial inputs. It’s essential because many attacks only surface after deployment. Tools like PointGuard AI Runtime Defense block harmful outputs before they reach the user
Mitigation strategies include implementing AI-based voice biometrics, multi-factor verification for high-value approvals, and deepfake detection tools. Organizations should also train employees to identify signs of synthetic media and enforce multi-channel transaction verification
Best practices include:
The biggest AI risks include deepfake fraud, prompt injection attacks, AI supply chain compromises, data poisoning, and model theft. These threats can cause financial loss, operational disruption, and reputational damage. In the GCC, risks are amplified due to rapid AI adoption without mature governance frameworks.
AI-driven threats exploit model behavior instead of just technical flaws. Deepfakes bypass human verification, prompt injections manipulate AI into leaking sensitive data, and poisoned datasets silently degrade accuracy—all without triggering conventional security alerts.
A prompt injection attack manipulates an AI system with malicious instructions hidden inside normal input. For example, a UAE financial chatbot could be tricked into revealing account details. Mitigation includes pre-deployment red teaming, runtime AI monitoring, and output sanitization.
In an AI supply chain attack, a malicious third-party model is integrated into your system. This can disable safety controls, leak data, or inject backdoors. GCC sectors like oil & gas, BFSI, and telecom are especially vulnerable due to reliance on open-source AI models.
Data poisoning occurs when attackers feed corrupted data into training pipelines, teaching AI to make harmful or incorrect decisions. Secure data pipelines, provenance checks, and anomaly detection are essential to prevention.
Model theft allows competitors or attackers to copy your proprietary AI via repeated queries. Stolen models can be rebranded, resold, or used for malicious purposes without your R&D investment. Defences include query rate limiting and output watermarking.
While 72% of GCC security leaders cite AI threats as a top IT risk, one-third still do not perform regular AI security testing. This gap leaves critical vulnerabilities unaddressed, increasing exposure to targeted AI cyber threats.
Businesses can use NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP LLM Top 10, and the EU AI Act. These frameworks guide AI risk management best practices, compliance, and security posture alignment for UAE and GCC regulations.
Runtime AI defense monitors live prompts and outputs to detect jailbreak attempts, prompt injection, and data leaks in real time. It blocks malicious outputs before they reach users, ensuring compliance with UAE data protection laws.
Implement voice biometrics, multi-factor authentication, and deepfake detection tools. Train teams to verify approvals via secure multi-channel communication.
FSD-Tech delivers end-to-end AI protection—from asset discovery and model testing to runtime AI defense and supply chain monitoring—helping GCC and UAE enterprises comply with regulations, reduce risks, and secure innovation.
Deepfake fraud, prompt injection attacks, AI supply‑chain compromises, data poisoning, model theft, and insecure integrations. These can trigger financial loss, service outages, and compliance issues.
They target model behavior (e.g., jailbreaks, evasions) instead of just code flaws. Deepfakes bypass human checks; poisoned data quietly skews outcomes; prompt injection hides inside “normal” user input.
A malicious instruction embedded in user input that makes your LLM ignore rules, leak data, or run unintended actions. Mitigate with pre‑deployment red teaming, strict input/output filters, and runtime monitoring.
A tainted third‑party model/library is integrated into your stack, carrying backdoors or unsafe defaults. Enforce AI‑BOMs, provenance checks, and model scanning before use.
Attackers corrupt training or retraining data so the model learns unsafe patterns (e.g., ignoring fraud signals). Secure pipelines, verify data provenance, and monitor output shifts.
Adversaries can clone your model via repeated queries, stealing IP and enabling copycat products. Defend with query rate‑limits, watermarking, and private/isolated deployment.
Yes—rapid AI adoption, cross‑border data, and open‑source dependencies in oil & gas, BFSI, and telecom increase supply‑chain and compliance risk without mature governance.
Start with NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP LLM Top 10, and track EU AI Act risk classes. Map controls to UAE/KSA data protection requirements.
It inspects live prompts/outputs to catch jailbreaks, data leaks, and policy violations—blocking unsafe responses before users see them. Essential once your AI is in production.
Use voice biometrics, require MFA and out‑of‑band approval for high‑value actions, and adopt deepfake detection. Train finance/AP teams on verification workflows.
We deliver end‑to‑end coverage—AI discovery, model testing, AI‑SPM, runtime defense, and supply‑chain assurance—tailored to GCC/UAE regulations and your industry stack.
Mohd Elayyan is a forward-thinking entrepreneur, cybersecurity expert, and AI governance leader known for his ability to anticipate technological trends and bring cutting-edge innovations to the Middle East and Africa before they become mainstream. With a career spanning offensive security, digital...
Share it with friends!